The corridors of energy more and more resemble a nursing dwelling—if not a hospice.
This yr, two veteran members of Congress, Republican Consultant Kay Granger from Texas and Democratic Consultant Annie M. Kuster of New Hampshire, introduced that they have been retiring from public service, however the story of their final days performed out very in another way, illustrating the hazards of a political system that allows each gerontocracy and elder abuse.
In March, Granger, age 81, introduced that she was stepping down from her highly effective submit as chair of the Home Appropriation Committee and wouldn’t search reelection, despite the fact that she would end out her time period. She forged her final vote on July 24, and has appeared in Washington solely as soon as since. For all intents and functions, Granger had disappeared from public visibility.
On December 20, The Dallas Specific, a conservative on-line publication, revealed that Granger had been dwelling in an impartial dwelling facility. Previous to that discovery, Granger’s workplace was not returning telephone calls to the Specific or anybody else. Visiting her workplace, reporter Carl Turcios discovered “the door locked, the entrance door glass window coated, nobody inside, and no signal of the workplace persevering with to be occupied.”
Responding to those reviews, the congresswoman’s son, Brandon Granger, acknowledged that his mom suffered from “dementia,” a situation he claimed was recognized in September. Granger’s workplace shared a press release the place she purportedly said that “since early September, my well being challenges have progressed, making frequent journey to Washington each tough and unpredictable. Throughout this time, my employees has remained steadfast, persevering with to ship distinctive constituent providers, as they’ve for the previous 27 years.”
This model of Granger’s story, which locations the onset of dementia in September, makes little sense, since, as Ken Klippenstein reviews on his Substack, there may be evidence that as early as March she had problem studying even from a ready assertion with out painful effort. Additional, she bought her dwelling in early July, which signifies that her transfer to the impartial dwelling facility was already within the works at the moment.
Granger ultimately resigned her seat—however too late. If she had left public service just a few years in the past, she’d be remembered as a pioneer, the primary Republican girl to steer the Home Appropriations Committee. Now, there’s a pall on her legacy since, as The New York Occasions reports, she has “introduced renewed consideration to how Capitol Hill is powered by a crop of septuagenarians and octogenarians, together with some who refuse to relinquish energy even far previous their primes.”
Granger’s fellow congresswoman Annie M. Kuster, age 68, presents a telling distinction. In an interview with The Boston Globe, Kuster made clear that she is leaving Washington not only for private causes but additionally to point out that lawmakers do in reality have the power to reject gerontocracy. In keeping with Kuster, “I’m making an attempt to set a greater instance. I believe there are colleagues—and a few of whom are nonetheless very profitable and really productive—however others who simply keep perpetually.”
The Granger case, together with new reporting making clear that Joe Biden has served as a diminished president, is forcing gerontocracy onto the agenda in Washington. Apart from Biden and Granger, there are actually increasing expressions of concerns concerning the superior age and healthcare struggles of former Home speaker Nancy Pelosi and outgoing Senate Republican chief Mitch McConnell (each of whom, regardless of formally giving up highly effective posts, stay kingmakers in Washington). Questions have also been raised about Democratic Consultant David Scott of Georgia, with even fellow Democrats expressing skepticism about his potential to serve. The choice to sideline younger congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez within the Home Oversight Committee on behalf of Gerry Connolly, who’s 74 and suffers from most cancers, has been criticized even by centrist Democrats akin to Jen Psaki as proof of entrenched gerontocracy.
It is a main shift from current years, when a bipartisan code of silence protected elected officers and judges from being criticized despite the fact that there was ample proof that age had made them incapable of serving.
Republican Consultant Thomas Massie of Kentucky responded to the Granger story by tweeting, “I’m extra involved concerning the congressmen who’ve dementia and are nonetheless voting.”
Democratic Consultant Ro Khanna of California tweeted:
Kay Granger’s lengthy absence reveals the issue with a Congress that rewards seniority & relationships greater than advantage & concepts. We now have a sclerotic gerontocracy. We’d like time period limits. We have to get huge cash out of politics so a brand new technology of Individuals can run and serve.
Khanna’s assertion has the advantage of transferring the dialogue past simply the person selections of lawmakers and into the broader system that has made gerontocracy attainable. Republican firebrand Kerri Lake, who hardly ever agrees with Khanna on something—and is seldom a voice of cause—additionally supplied a systemic evaluation, tweeting, “Washington D.C. shouldn’t be a retirement dwelling, however the entrenched forces there are so determined to carry on to energy that they are going to reject recent voices whereas pulling stunts like this.”
Khanna and Lake are correct in seeing the issue as entrenched techniques. The principles of Congress reward seniority with extra energy, which additionally makes it logical for voters to maintain voting for longtime lawmakers even previous the decline of their capability. These lawmakers have employees who can make it possible for the perks of energy are nonetheless shared with constituents.
These staffers themselves represent an essential enabling pressure for gerontocracy. In any case, a diminished political chief mainly acts as a figurehead or puppet for staffers who can train actual energy behind the scenes. Joe Biden’s presidency might have been a tragedy for the Democrats, for America, and for the world—however for figures like nationwide safety adviser Jake Sullivan or chief of employees Jeff Zients (and his predecessor Ron Klain), it was an opportunity to pursue their imaginative and prescient of the world with out the type of obstacle which may have been anticipated from a totally alert and cognizant president.
Fashionable
“swipe left under to view extra authors”Swipe →
Previously, I’ve worried about america turning into a gerontocracy. However it’s now clear that gerontocracy is barely half of the issue. The gerontocracy itself creates the circumstances for a horrifying type of elder abuse, the place aged and diminished leaders are used as puppets by unelected officers.
Democrats unsuccessfully tried to make Donald Trump’s risk to democracy a serious marketing campaign situation within the presidential election. One cause this gambit failed is that the Democrats painted too slender and unconvincing a portrait of the risk. It’s true that Trump, an authoritarian demagogue, is a risk to democracy. However his rise is symptomatic of a bigger breakdown within the system, which additionally consists of the hazards of gerontocracy and elder abuse. Certainly, Trump, who’s coming into workplace because the oldest elected president and is a weathervane simply shifted by his advisers, is an instance of those issues as nicely.
Sadly, Democrats—as a result of they themselves are responsible of gerontocracy and elder abuse—lack the credibility to assert assist as the answer to this grave downside. As soon as once more, Trump is ready to triumph because of the fecklessness of the Democratic Occasion institution.
With a hostile incoming administration, a large infrastructure of courts and judges ready to show “freedom of speech” right into a nostalgic reminiscence, and legacy newsrooms quickly abandoning their duty to supply correct, fact-based reporting, impartial media has its work lower out for itself.
At The Nation, we’re steeling ourselves for an uphill battle as we struggle to uphold reality, transparency, and mental freedom—and we will’t do it alone.
This month, each reward The Nation receives by way of December 31 will probably be doubled, as much as $75,000. If we hit the total match, we begin 2025 with $150,000 within the financial institution to fund political commentary and evaluation, deep-diving reporting, incisive media criticism, and the group that makes all of it attainable.
As different information organizations muffle their dissent or soften their strategy, The Nation stays devoted to talking reality to energy, participating in patriotic dissent, and empowering our readers to struggle for justice and equality. As an impartial publication, we’re not beholden to stakeholders, company traders, or authorities affect. Our allegiance is to information and transparency, to honoring our abolitionist roots, to the ideas of justice and equality—and to you, our readers.
Within the weeks and months forward, the work of free and impartial journalists will matter greater than ever earlier than. Individuals will want entry to correct reporting, crucial evaluation, and deepened understanding of the problems they care about, from local weather change and immigration to reproductive justice and political authoritarianism.
By standing with The Nation now, you’re investing not simply in impartial journalism grounded in reality, but additionally within the potentialities that reality will create.
The opportunity of a galvanized public. Of a extra simply society. Of significant change, and a extra radical, liberated tomorrow.
In solidarity and in motion,
The Editors, The Nation