What Two Kingdoms Theology Really Is

“My kingdom will not be of this world,” declares Jesus. In some of the memorable conversations in all of Scripture, addressing the consultant of what was then probably the most highly effective kingdom on earth, the Roman Empire, he continues, “If my kingdom have been of this world, my servants would have been preventing, that I won’t be delivered over to the Jews” (John 18:36 ESV).

If that is all we needed to go on, we is perhaps tempted towards a sort of gnostic spiritualism, imagining Christ’s kingdom as one thing so invisible and otherworldly that it serves solely to supply us an escape from this world’s darkness and violence. And but elsewhere Christ tells us “the kingdom of God is within the midst of you” (Luke 17:21 ESV) and describes its development inside the world as leaven, suffusing the entire dough, or like a tiny mustard seed, rising into an excellent tree by which the birds can nest (Matt 13:31–32). Scripture tells us, furthermore, that even when Christ’s kingdom is “not of this world,” the kingdoms of this world will turn out to be a part of it (Rev 11:15), the nations will probably be his possession (Ps 2:8), and “the kings of the earth will carry their glory into it” (Rev 21:24).

Clearly, though Christ’s kingdom will not be this-worldly, neither is it strictly otherworldly: it takes root right here and now, and makes claims upon earthly rulers. As I search to indicate on this article, the doctrine of the 2 kingdoms offers a beneficial framework for making sense of each the unity and duality of Christ’s reign.

The 2 kingdoms as traditionally developed

Christian theology has all the time sought to do justice to this duality in a roundabout way or one other. Augustine’s well-known doctrine of the 2 cities warned towards any effort to try to discover Christ’s non secular reign inside the fumbling and crumbling rule of the later Christian emperors of Rome, whereas additionally stressing that town of God was not a purely future actuality, however took form inside historical past in the neighborhood of the church. A couple of a long time later, Pope Gelasius articulated what turned generally known as the 2 swords doctrine, claiming that, whereas bishops ruled by means of the non secular sword of God’s Phrase, kings ruled by means of the temporal sword of earthly rewards and punishments.

The so-called “two kingdoms” doctrine overlaps in sure methods with these earlier paradigms, but in addition represents a particular Reformational strategy to the issue, anchored in Protestant convictions in regards to the nature of salvation and the position of the church. The doctrine is often attributed to Martin Luther, who incessantly used the language of zwei Reiche (two kingdoms) and zwei Regimente (two governments) all through his writings of the 1520s and 1530s: the one “worldly,” “temporal,” or “civil”; the opposite “non secular.” Calvin too buildings his well-known Institutes explicitly by way of the doctrine, declaring in a key passage on the finish of Ebook III,

The previous has its seat inside the soul, the latter solely regulates the exterior conduct. We could name the one the non secular, the opposite the civil kingdom. Now, these two, as now we have divided them, are all the time to be seen aside from one another. When the one is taken into account, we should always name off our minds, and never enable them to consider the opposite. For there exists in man a sort of two worlds, over which totally different kings and totally different legal guidelines can preside.

Not the entire Reformers used precisely the identical language or emphasised the 2 kingdoms in the identical method. However practically all labored inside its primary logic, and a few, equivalent to Philipp Melanchthon or Peter Martyr Vermigli usually drew upon it in debates on ecclesiology, Christian liberty, or political theology. It might additionally play an essential position in conflicts between so-called “puritans” and “Anglican” conformists within the early Church of England.

Because the citation from Calvin suggests, nevertheless, we should always not consider the 2 kingdoms doctrine as mainly a matter of Christian political thought, used to divvy up the respective duties of church and state. It actually has implications for that query, as we will see, however it’s far broader and extra elementary. Certainly, the language of “two kingdoms,” which has turn out to be customary in each scholarly and fashionable therapies, is probably unhelpful or deceptive, suggesting because it does two rival domains inside earthly life. This doctrine has additionally been characterised as a doctrine of two ages—highlighting its eschatological perform in distinguishing between this current life and the life to return—or as a doctrine of two realms—highlighting the 2 totally different planes of existence inside which the Christian life is lived, one hidden and non secular, the opposite seen and earthly.

Maybe the most effective language, although, and that which Luther himself most popular, was that of the 2 governments. This highlights the dynamic character of the doctrine as a paradigm for understanding the 2 very totally different, but complementary, methods by which Jesus Christ workout routines his rule over the world, and over Christians inside it.

1. By one, he upholds and sustains the created order which, even in its fallen state, displays God’s glory and gives a becoming habitat for his image-bearers.
2. By the opposite, he redeems his individuals from their state of alienation and non secular dying, and transforms them into emissaries of his rule, capable of act inside the temporal kingdom in ways in which extra practically replicate God’s authentic will for creation.

The doctrine ought to thus assist us consider two totally different modes of Christian life on this planet, not two totally different spheres, because the lifetime of the institutional church itself has elements of every, as we will see.

Two kingdoms dominated by one king

We should emphasize on the outset that the 2 kingdoms (I’ll defer to the widespread terminology, regardless of its limitations) are each below God. It might be out of query to make use of this doctrine to secularize the affairs of this world within the sense of constructing them completely impartial and non-religious, as in the event that they could possibly be carried on correctly with complete disregard to their Creator.

In distinguishing the 2 kingdoms, then, we should each start and finish with their unity. They discover their preliminary unity within the one triune God who has ordered all issues for his glory, and guidelines over all issues by means of each his secret and his revealed will. His revealed will is made obvious each in nature itself (pure regulation) and in Scripture. The 2 kingdoms then discover their final unity within the consummation of all issues below God’s rule on the final day.

Not solely do each kingdoms belong to God, although. We could also be extra particular and say that each belong to Jesus Christ: the temporal kingdom inasmuch as he’s the Logos by means of whom the world was created (John 1:3), and in whom all issues maintain collectively (Col 1:17); the non secular kingdom inasmuch as he’s the redeemer of the world, the one mediator between God and man (Heb 9:15). Furthermore, his non secular reign as redeemer has implications for the temporal order as nicely, because the kings of the earth are compelled to acknowledge their subordination to the ascended Christ (Ps 2:1–12). Each Previous and New Testaments are constant in testifying that as Messiah, the anointed one, Jesus has acquired a crown above all crowns, reigning as king over earthly kings.

Totally different eschatologies could disagree as to precisely when and the way these prophecies are fulfilled. Nonetheless, we will safely generalize that, by advantage of his ascension, Jesus has in some sense already been enthroned as common king (Phil 2:9–11), however that this won’t be manifest till the consummation. At that time, Christ “delivers the dominion to God the Father after destroying each rule and each authority and energy. For he should reign till he has put all his enemies below his ft” (1 Cor 15:24–25 ESV). Thus we will say that, whereas divided now, the 2 kingdoms will finally be united in a single reign on the final day.

Two kingdoms for 2 totally different functions

Maybe an important distinction between the 2 kingdoms pertains to their ends or functions.

By his temporal reign, Christ preserves and maintains the created order in accordance with the legal guidelines prescribed for it in to start with. After the autumn, this created order is marred however not altogether misplaced. Though human beings have turn out to be desperately depraved, God guarantees in Genesis 9 by no means once more to carry a catastrophic judgment on all humanity till the top of the age (2 Pet 3:5–7). Within the meantime, women and men proceed to do strange human actions like marrying, elevating kids, organizing societies, farming and innovating, and searching for information of their world. Certainly, albeit in a hopelessly fallen method, they nonetheless once in a while reach finishing up fragments of God’s authentic goal for humankind (Gen 1:26–28). Over all this, God providentially reigns. By his widespread grace he restrains sin from coming to its fullest expression.

Nevertheless, that is clearly not sufficient. God intends to revive humanity to concord with each other and with himself. Accordingly in Genesis 3 he had promised {that a} savior will come, a promise progressively elaborated by means of his covenants with Abraham, Moses, and David. Already inside the Previous Testomony, God begins to ascertain the non secular kingdom with the aim of redeeming a individuals for himself. After the coming of Christ, this redemptive kingdom turns into manifest within the lifetime of believers and is recognized with the church—albeit the hidden non secular actuality of the church not seen to human eyes.

Though not all two kingdoms theologians use the classes of covenant theology, the 2 discourses can assist illuminate one another. God administers the temporal kingdom by means of the Noahic Covenant, promising to protect the world and outwardly restrain evil by means of companies like civil authorities (usually seen to be implied within the assertion in Gen 9:6: “Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed” ESV). The non secular kingdom, nevertheless, is run by means of the covenant of redemption in its numerous phases from Abraham to Christ.

It needs to be famous additionally that the 2 kingdoms have totally different memberships. All of humanity lies below Christ’s temporal kingdom—which is for that reason usually referred to as the “widespread kingdom,” together with duties and blessings widespread to all individuals, saved and unsaved. As Matthew 5:45 says, “For he [God] makes his solar rise on the evil and on the nice, and sends rain on the simply and on the unjust” (ESV). Believers alone are members of the non secular kingdom, which signifies that they’ve a twin citizenship as each residents of notably earthly parts of the temporal kingdom (Acts 22:25–28) and as residents of the heavenly kingdom (Phil 3:20).

Use Logos’s Factbook to check theological ideas like the two kingdoms doctrine.

Two kingdoms ruled by two totally different legal guidelines

As a result of they’re ordered towards totally different ends, the 2 kingdoms are regulated by totally different legal guidelines.

In conventional two kingdoms theology, pure regulation (or ethical regulation) is the rule by which God governs the temporal or widespread kingdom. That’s to say, the usual for all mankind, saved or unsaved, continues to be the fundamental ethical order inscribed upon human nature by creation, and inscribed on human hearts by means of the testimony of conscience (Rom 1:19–20, 2:14–15). This regulation will not be a matter of autonomous cause, however is our participation within the Logos by means of the logoi (rational rules) that he has implanted in us. The Ten Commandments are typically taken to be a sort of abstract of this regulation, with the primary desk spelling out our primary ethical duties towards God that now we have by advantage of creation (Exod 20:2–11), and the second desk our primary duties towards each other (Exod 20:12–17).

Civil authorities is charged with upholding this pure regulation, specifying it in applicable human legal guidelines for every specific time and place, and implementing it as applicable by means of outward punishment. In fact, due to the autumn, we now not discern pure regulation as we should always. Certainly most cultures have turn out to be deeply corrupt of their ethical habits and civil legal guidelines, particularly in relation to issues of the primary desk (thus the ubiquity of idolatry), though the broad outlines of the second desk are nonetheless typically discerned. Fashionable Protestants typically depart from the older two kingdoms doctrine in suggesting that the primary desk shouldn’t be enforced by civil authorities, although the 2 will be reconciled if we see this as a prudential lodging to the realities of pluralism.

For the reason that non secular kingdom considerations the best way of redemption made potential by means of divine grace alone, it should be ruled by a typical that cause may by no means arrive at by itself. Solely by revealing to us in his Phrase the best way of salvation by means of religion in Christ may we ever turn out to be members within the non secular kingdom.

Though Scripture’s major goal is to inform us what God has achieved for us and name on us to easily consider, receiving Christ’s completed work with religion, it additionally tells us how we’re to put maintain of the technique of grace and reply in thanksgiving. This consists of Scripture’s educating concerning the sacraments, steerage in how to pray, and learn how to conduct the non secular lifetime of the church. That is typically referred to as supernatural regulation because it comes from above nature and guides us towards our supernatural finish. It’s solely ample for that finish and doesn’t should be supplemented by some other authority.

In quite simple phrases, then, we would say that whereas pure regulation and human prudence govern the temporal kingdom, Scripture governs the non secular kingdom. This may be too simplistic, nevertheless. For one factor, we should watch out for pondering that your complete lifetime of the church is solely the area of the non secular kingdom. A lot of its actions are temporal of their means and ends—useful for ordering the outward lifetime of the church, however not important to its salvific process (e.g., constructing committees, finances conferences, and fellowship teams). A lot of the Reformers even put most elements of church polity and liturgy within the temporal kingdom. As such, these items have been knowledgeable by Scripture, but in addition by cause, prudence, and different sources of authority.

For one more factor, although, Scripture will not be restricted to giving us supernatural regulation. “All Scripture is breathed out by God and worthwhile for educating, for reproof, for correction, and for coaching in righteousness, that the person of God could also be full, geared up for each good work” (2 Tim 3:16–17 ESV). The Bible thus speaks to many issues of strange human life, reaffirming and clarifying the testimony of pure regulation which has been so distorted by the autumn.

Two kingdoms administered by two totally different means

If the 2 kingdoms are ordered towards totally different functions and ruled by totally different legal guidelines, it mustn’t shock us that Christ additionally governs them by totally different means. The temporal kingdom is ruled by the sword, the non secular kingdom by the Phrase. Each of those require some rationalization.

We famous above that the temporal kingdom mustn’t merely be equated with the state or the area of civil authorities. And but, that’s its highest expression. All the things from the grocery retailer to the grammar faculty to your native soccer workforce is a part of the temporal kingdom, and we don’t ordinarily consider these as ruled by the sword. That stated, all of them lie below the ultimate jurisdiction of the civil authorities.

Whereas, in well-functioning societies, civil authorities hardly ever have to make use of the sword to settle disputes or guarantee obedience, they do bear the ability of life and dying within the final resort, which is why Paul can write, “he doesn’t bear the sword in useless. For he’s the servant of God, who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer” (Rom 13:4 ESV). Extra typically, then, the sword refers to any type of rule that depends finally on concern of exterior punishment, mediating God’s wrath.

The Phrase, however, guidelines within the hearts of believers by means of the promise of divine favor, mediating God’s mercy. The Phrase thus refers to Scripture, however Scripture seen from a sure perspective, not merely as a textual content, however as one thing “residing and lively, sharper than any two-edged sword, piercing to the division of soul and of spirit, of joints and of marrow, and discerning the ideas and intentions of the center” (Heb 4:12 ESV).

Luther’s distinction of law and gospel performed a job right here, with the regulation driving us by means of concern of punishment to God’s life-giving gospel phrase of promise, which guidelines in our hearts by religion. The non secular kingdom, then, as an primarily hidden actuality, is dominated by hidden graces bestowed by the Holy Spirit; inside it, the regulation itself is reworked from a punishing grasp right into a information for the way we could gratefully reply to God.

In fact, the non secular kingdom will not be totally hidden. Though we will by no means know for positive who enjoys a life-giving union with Christ, the seen church is the outward image of the physique of Christ. In it, the technique of grace are bestowed by means of effectual outward indicators: the Spirit imparts life to our hearts by means of the spoken phrases of the preacher, the cleaning waters of baptism, the bread and wine of the Lord’s Supper.

Within the non secular kingdom, then, as within the temporal, God has his ministers to behave on his behalf. But there’s an asymmetry: the ministers of the temporal kingdom (civil authorities) have discretionary authority to make binding legal guidelines; the ministers of the non secular kingdom (pastors), nevertheless, can solely proclaim what Scripture teaches. Civil authorities can implement their instructions, whereas pastors can solely bear witness to God’s future punishments. These civil legal guidelines will even regulate, in some measure, the lifetime of the church (even in trendy America, church buildings are certain by hearth codes and baby security legal guidelines). The seen church, then, straddles each kingdoms.

That stated, it’s on this level of the church’s institutional autonomy that there have been some variations between kinds of two-kingdoms theology. Whereas Lutherans, as an illustration, strongly emphasised the inner character of the non secular kingdom and argued that the exterior lifetime of the church can take many various varieties in several contexts, Calvinists (particularly among the many English and Scottish Presbyterians; Calvin himself was maybe someplace within the center) argued that the non secular kingdom too has its exterior legal guidelines and punishments, which civil authorities mustn’t ever tamper with.

Two kingdoms in utility as we speak

Totally different variants of two kingdoms theology continued early trendy debates over political theology. All Protestants acknowledged the necessity for a mutual subjection of ministers and magistrates, as ministers submitted to magistrates in affairs of the temporal kingdom, whereas magistrates bowed to the authority of the Phrase as proclaimed by the ministers. However grey areas have been certain to emerge, particularly in a society the place practically all residents have been baptized, and by which magistrates themselves have been usually religious readers of Scripture, searching for to use it of their governing. So as we speak, though we could have largely disentangled church and state as establishments, the boundaries of jurisdiction will nonetheless be fuzzy typically, because the current pandemic confirmed.

Even when now we have defused some conflicts of political theology by separating church and state, we might be fallacious to assume that now we have thereby disentangled the 2 kingdoms. Once more, these are higher understood as two governments, two methods by which Christ workout routines his common rule. As such, the non secular authority of the Phrase and the corrective imaginative and prescient is provides for discerning the calls for of justice should form the Christian in political life. Likewise the calls for of temporal existence should form the Christian ready of church authority as he makes monetary choices, personnel choices, and even liturgical choices. Every of us should discover ourselves continually negotiating our obligations to God and our neighbor below each types of rule.

If the 2 kingdoms are each current at each level of the believer’s existence, one may ask what’s the level of this doctrine? If “each sq. inch of creation” cries out Christ’s title, as Abraham Kuyper famously stated, then why not simply converse of 1 kingdom? In some methods we actually can, inasmuch as the 2 share one king and will probably be introduced collectively on the final day. But the two-kingdoms doctrine nonetheless has a deeply beneficial position to play within the lifetime of the church and the believer.

Most basically, it might probably take the stress off. It could actually remind us that whereas all issues are Christ’s, many are destined to go away. They could present scaffolding for the wonderful construction he’s constructing, however they aren’t a part of it. We are able to sit evenly and breathe simply within the affairs of politics, economics, and institutional life typically, recognizing that neither our salvation nor the success of Christ’s work are at stake in such issues. We are able to maintain our eyes fastened on the Word of God and the technique of grace somewhat than inserting our hope in worldly powers or our personal works.

Above all, the 2 kingdoms doctrine can open house to be comfy with uncertainty. By it we will distinguish between the realm by which Scripture alone tells us every part we have to know, and the realm by which God leaves us far more to our personal wits, to navigate the world with knowledge—knowledge nurtured by Scripture, in fact, but in addition by our personal remark and expertise of the world, equivalent to Solomon exhibits us in Proverbs. Too many Protestants are inclined to oscillate between legalism and libertinism—both trying to the Bible as a complete answer-book and turning every part right into a gospel problem, or assuming that every part outdoors the non secular kingdom is secular terrain the place we will do as we please.

The temporal realm is a spot of legal guidelines, norms, authorities, and self-discipline, however provisional ones—we’re allowed to get it fallacious typically. We are able to get pleasure from this freedom below authority within the temporal kingdom exactly as a result of we all know the liberty of reigning along with Christ within the non secular kingdom. Thus, guided by the two-kingdoms doctrine, we will “reside as people who find themselves free, not utilizing your freedom as a cover-up for evil, however residing as servants of God” (1 Pet 2:16 ESV).

Enrich your understanding of two kingdoms theology

• Jonathan Beeke, Duplex Regnum Christi: Christ’s Twofold Kingdom in Reformed Theology (Brill, 2021)
• Matthew J. Tuininga, Calvin’s Political Theology and the Public Engagement of the Church: Christ’s Two Kingdoms (Cambridge College Press, 2017)
• John Witte Jr., Regulation and Protestantism: The Authorized Teachings of the Lutheran Reformation (Cambridge College Press, 2002)

Associated articles